|
|
Silver Dragon Breath dragon forums
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Syrobe Founder

Joined: 23 Aug 2003 Posts: 596
|
Posted: Mon 27 Aug 2007 13:40 Post subject: Academic attitude |
|
|
Some students do not want to think for themselves, they want the professor to thell them the awnsers to their questions, see it all worked out in their books or they do not want to have any questions at all. They want all academic problems to be solvd and sorted out for them.
In my opinion, such students do not have an academic attitude and they should not be allowed to go to University (or they should be forced to leave in case they already are there...).
To me, a student with an academic attitude is a person who is curious, who wants to learn, who tries to form an opinion on all sorts of matters, tries to debate with others about those matters, asks questions and tries to find awnsers. The mind is open and and the brain is at work most of the time.
At University, I would like to see students with an academic attitude.
Those who do not have that attitude, should leave or be forced to leave University.
Do you agree or not and why? _________________ - power is gained through wisdom - |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ragnarok Global Moderator


Joined: 27 Sep 2004 Posts: 1091 Location: Tucson, AZ, USA.
|
Posted: Mon 27 Aug 2007 15:01 Post subject: |
|
|
On a similar note, however, I don't think professors who expect the students to figure out everything themselves are good at their job, either, especially in the introductory-level courses. In those, I think it's better for the professors to explain things as thoroughly as they can, since the material is all (or mostly) new, and the students often have little or no background in that area. In the more advanced courses, however, when the students already have some knowledge of the field and how things work, then it's reasonable to expect them to know enough to ask valid questions or figure out at least some of the material on their own. _________________ To win against an opponent stronger than yourself, you must not be weaker than that opponent. - Takamachi Nanoha |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ahndeleck Dragonstar
Joined: 09 Apr 2007 Posts: 23 Location: Arkansas
|
Posted: Mon 27 Aug 2007 16:18 Post subject: |
|
|
I would have to take a less harsh mode of your opinion. Partially that chances are I'd get thrown out when I'm on my last semester worth of classes. :P I tend to be the quiet one that won't ask questions nor give opinions or thoughts generally. But thats because i'm letting the pers I believe that have the knowledge spread it and I'l capture everything that I can.
Now for those students that go and expect to be spoon fed a degree, yes, let's get them out of there. Other students however seem to learn great deals from asking questions about things in lecture or homework. I think that anyone there that can learn and is willing to learn something should have a chance, even if that means they might have to struggle a little on the way. I know I sure have. My GPA will proove it. -_- _________________ Soar high,
Ahn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shadow Dragon Dragonstar
Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 236 Location: In a place everyone can imagine
|
Posted: Mon 27 Aug 2007 21:08 Post subject: |
|
|
That could all depend on the area of topic as well. If a student wanted to become a zoologist, they are generally going to be more enthusiastic about the courses they want to take, and then "going with the flow" for the courses required. It would be unfair to say kick them out if they are just sliding by for boring classes (in perspective to their opinion).
Of course, I do agree that those people trying to 'complete' their education with a piece of paper and title should not bother. And lets be honest, they wouldn't bother if their career paths didn't demand documentation. Oh well. _________________ Here I lay, my claws and tail at peace. I rest my eyes and begin to sleep. Dreams fill my visions as mankind has fallen and dragons rule again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rayadragon Shining Dragonstar

Joined: 28 Oct 2003 Posts: 264 Location: Somewhere between reality and imagination
|
Posted: Tue 28 Aug 2007 12:52 Post subject: |
|
|
The good news is that at least some of the students who fall into the "just give me the answer" mentality tend to leave for their own reasons, such as not getting the grades they need. In the process though they get to annoy their professors (and TAs...) and take up time that could be better spent helping those who truly want to learn (instead of having arguments about why you can't just give them the answer since you're not the one taking their tests).
Ragnarok's got a valid point in that, at least in America, it takes time to shift from the more public education role of spoonfeeding/rote (sp?) memorization all the information to a student to the more university education role of teaching students to think for themselves. Personally I'd rather see some of that independent thinking starting earlier, but at least initially in university some of the classes are going to have to focus on bridging that gap between book-learning and self directed-learning.
Shadow Dragon also has a point that, again in America (I'm not sure if the system is the same where you are Syrobe. I've gotten the impression before that course selection in Europe is a bit different than in America), students are often forced to take classes that they'd really, really rather not take. I don't think I would've ever forgiven my University if they hadn't let me test out of the English writing courses, where I could learn such important things as what nouns and adjectives were, and how to properly write a paper with an introduction, supporting paragraphs, and a conclusion (no joke!!). Sometimes it really is just hard to be enthusiastic about topics you have no interest in taking, but are forced to take as part of a "well rounded" education.
As a bit of an offshoot of the original question, what role, if any, should a university have in rejecting a student who wants to learn, but they can't seem to quite make the grade? I had one good friend who desperatly wanted to be a marine biologist, except she could never manage anything above a "C" (average) in any of the biology classes. It was the same for her geology classes, which was her second choice. Another friend of mine wanted to do zoology, but he flat out failed his zoology course, and pretty much the only reason he didn't fail some of his other science courses was because I could help him out in them. They both had a genuine desire to learn, but I couldn't help but feel bad for them at the same time because the concepts just seemed to be beyond them. In many ways, I wish the university had done more to convince them that maybe higher education wasn't for them, rather than having them waste the time and money to study for a degree that they were never going to get. _________________ "People who are easily offended need to be offended more often."
"Do on to others as you would have others do on to you." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Namhias Shining Dragonstar
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 Posts: 1055
|
Posted: Tue 28 Aug 2007 14:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| I agree with Syrobe. If you chose a study, you should go for it. The ones who think that they're going to get the information an a silver dinner plate, should be given a cold shower to wake up. I think one of the main reasons why a person doesn't do anything, is because he is not really motivated. That could be the case because he either chose the wrong study, or because the teacher isn't motivating the students enough. If a teacher is serious about his job and makes funny comments now and then for instance, I would be much more motivated then when I had a teacher who is also serious about his job, but hasn't got the humor or is very strict in a bad way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Syrobe Founder

Joined: 23 Aug 2003 Posts: 596
|
Posted: Fri 31 Aug 2007 7:18 Post subject: |
|
|
| Ragnarok wrote: |
| On a similar note, however, I don't think professors who expect the students to figure out everything themselves are good at their job, either, especially in the introductory-level courses. In those, I think it's better for the professors to explain things as thoroughly as they can, since the material is all (or mostly) new, and the students often have little or no background in that area. In the more advanced courses, however, when the students already have some knowledge of the field and how things work, then it's reasonable to expect them to know enough to ask valid questions or figure out at least some of the material on their own. |
I do agree with you on the professors note, but that in itself is not an argument against the opinion that who do not have that attitude, should leave or be forced to leave University. In my opinion, also the fesh-ones need that attitude. As a professor I do understand the lack of knowledge they have (as should other professors) but that leaves the statement unattacked.
| Ahndeleck wrote: |
| I tend to be the quiet one that won't ask questions nor give opinions or thoughts generally. |
As long as you have the required attitude, you should stay and learn. A good professor will notice that attitude anyway, even if you do not say much. It would be wise however, to show that you have that attitude once in while..
| Shadow Dragon wrote: |
| That could all depend on the area of topic as well. If a student wanted to become a zoologist, they are generally going to be more enthusiastic about the courses they want to take, and then "going with the flow" for the courses required. It would be unfair to say kick them out if they are just sliding by for boring classes (in perspective to their opinion). |
You have a good point there. Students who are enthousiastic because they know their goals and because they intent to work for those goals have more changes to develop an academis attitude. I suppose that attitude will be an overall attitude so they will even have it while going with the flow in some courses.
| Rayadragon wrote: |
| As a bit of an offshoot of the original question, what role, if any, should a university have in rejecting a student who wants to learn, but they can't seem to quite make the grade? In many ways, I wish the university had done more to convince them that maybe higher education wasn't for them, rather than having them waste the time and money to study for a degree that they were never going to get. |
We have given that idea serious thought and came to the conclusion that university has to force students to leave at an early stage of their study (the first year). We are doing that now since two years. However, sometimes such a problem shows up later, for example in their third year. Is sounds hars, but a similiar force could be wanted there too. Because I agree, it is better for the student and for the others.
| Namhias wrote: |
| I think one of the main reasons why a person doesn't do anything, is because he is not really motivated. That could be the case because he either chose the wrong study, or because the teacher isn't motivating the students enough. If a teacher is serious about his job and makes funny comments now and then for instance, I would be much more motivated then when I had a teacher who is also serious about his job, but hasn't got the humor or is very strict in a bad way. |
Would you also suggest the teacher to motivate that student by learning him how to gain an academis attitude? Or is that not a task for university but for the previous high school? _________________ - power is gained through wisdom -
Last edited by Syrobe on Fri 31 Aug 2007 14:18; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rayadragon Shining Dragonstar

Joined: 28 Oct 2003 Posts: 264 Location: Somewhere between reality and imagination
|
Posted: Fri 31 Aug 2007 10:27 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Would you also suggest the teacher to motivate that student by learning him how to gain an academis attitude? Or is that not a task for university but for the previous high school? |
I think this would be more a task for high school instead of the university. For many people, but the time they reach an age to be at the university, most of their habits have been set (such as studying) and most have at least some idea of what they want to do with their life. I think most would be mature enough to realize that if they want to get an education, they're going to have to work for it. They're going to be able (or should be able) to motivate themselves at that point. If they can't, they shouldn't enter the university then. Nothing says they couldn't start later once they have a better idea of what they want to do. _________________ "People who are easily offended need to be offended more often."
"Do on to others as you would have others do on to you." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|